Airborne Vaccine Developed To Vaccinate Public Without Consent

OPINION:  This article contains commentary which may reflect the author’s opinion

As the research has constantly flowed in on the vaccines hurriedly pushed on the public during the pandemic, it has become clear that vaccinations did not stop the spread of the virus, that those vaccinated got the virus anyway, and that those not vaccinated who developed natural antibodies were just as protected.

Of course, at the time, the shot was experimental but now there is more information available causing citizens of the U.S. to decline further shots. The shot is now connected through data to various health problems such as heart attacks and stroke. Sudden deaths across the nation have been suggested to be connected to vaccinations, and other drugs.

However, it seems that there is an effort to continue to push vaccines and that researchers are not held back by anything as limiting as consent. Yale University has been researching ways to deliver vaccines rather than get the consensual shot.

It is not revealed that a team of scientists at Yale has developed a new form of “airborne” mRNA vaccine that can be rapidly deployed among the public to vaccinate the masses without their knowledge or consent. The new airborne method delivers mRNA right into people’s lungs, bypassing the need for voluntary injections.

At this time, the method has been used to vaccinate mice intranasally, but the scientists note that animal tests have now “opened the door for human testing in the near future.”

This seems to be a statement of intention.

There does not seem to be any reason in a society where citizens are free to choose injections or not for the air to be contaminated with such a chemical. This would negate anyone from refusing the vaccination, regardless of existing medical issues that would make the vaccination dangerous, and eliminate the exemption provided by religious freedom for vaccinations.

Academic literature has previously suggested that “covert bio-enhancements” are coming, which brings to mind chemical warfare. Some may celebrate this invention as progressive, it obviously would negate any personal freedoms. Such an initiative seems unthinkable in the United States, but here we are with our own University developing such.

The research conducted on mice enabled Yale scientists to develop polymer nanoparticles to encapsulate mRNA. This method transforms mRNA into an inhalable form for delivery to the lungs.

This study was recently highlighted in the Science Translational Medicine publication. Science Translational Medicine‘s editor Courtney Malo explains that the airborne vaccines can be used to vaccinate the public for Covid without relying on injections.

Roman Balmakov raises the alarm about the new “Air Vax” during an episode of the Epoch Times show “Facts Matter.”

WATCH:

AS the CDC promotes getting shots for influenza this fall, and warns against contracting RSV, a virus that was forgotten during the pandemic, the government website also states that Covid-19 vaccines are “safe, effective and free” and that the federal government will sent up to 4 free tests per household.

The CDC site describes Covid-19 as “can be very contagious and spreads quickly. Most people with COVID=19 have mild symptoms, but some people become severely ill.”

The site describes the Flu as “a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs,” and describes RSV as “usually causes mild, cold-like symptoms. Most people recover in a week or two, but RSV can be serious, especially for babies and older adults.”

The CDC also reccommends vaccinations for pregnant women. The site states that this is the 38th week of Flu season.

The latest update on SARS CoV-2 Varient B.A.2.86, the new varient, as tracked by the CDC, states on the website “It is unclear how easily BA2.86 spreads compared to other circulating varients. At this time, BA2.86 does not appear to be rapidly increasing or driving increases in infections or hospitalizations in the United States.”

As Flu shots have been around for quite some time, and varients of viruses have been known to weaken as well as become more contagious as they mutate, the above information does not seem particularly alarming.

One wonders the basis of reaearch such as what has been done at Yale, especially in a free society where citizens have historically enjoyed medical freedom among other freedoms. In such an airborne initiative, and inaddition to taking away medical rights, those who might or would have adverse health effects from a vaccination would be put in peril intentionally and without their knowlege.

In 2019, Parker Crutchfield argued in a paper that “it is morally preferable for compulsory moral bioenhancement to be administered without the recipients knowing that they are receiving the enhancement.”

Cruthfield, a medical ethics professor at University of Michigan’s School of Medicine, argues that the administration is a matter of “public health,” thus stating that the perceived benefit of the whole society outweighs the needs of the individual. Exactly the opposite of a Constitutional Republic’s, such as the United States, regard for individual rights.

COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

 

 

 

 

 

Send this to a friend