Judge Issues MAJOR Ruling In Trump Case!

OPINION:  This article contains commentary which may reflect the author’s opinion

In his lawsuit involving confidential materials against former President Donald Trump, Special Counsel Jack Smith recently received a fortunate break from Federal Judge Aileen Cannon.

In a decision rendered on Tuesday, Cannon chose to support Smith about the withholding of the identities of several government witnesses who are expected to testify that President Trump took papers from the White House with knowledge that he was not authorized to do so. Smith had contended that hiding their identities would stop his witnesses from being retaliated against in the event that Trump wins in November.

The court document that the Daily Caller examined said, “The Court is satisfied that the Special Counsel has made an adequate showing on this issue under Rule 16, at least at this juncture pending final trial preparations.” “For use in the redactions of Defendants’ MTC, the Court directs the Special Counsel to file under seal an index containing the name of each potential government witness and a corresponding pseudonym/anonymization.”

Smith is now allowed to publish remarks made by specific witnesses under pseudonyms and with some identifying information redacted.

“An index identifying each potential government witness identified in any of the discovery materials attached or referenced in the MTC shall be filed under seal by the Special Counsel, with each given a corresponding pseudonym or anonymization (e.g., “John Smith” – NARA Employee 1).”

Judge Cannon chastised Smith for not presenting all grounds for anonymity earlier in the hearings, but she acknowledged that she would have proceeded more quickly on the topic.

She wrote in the paper, “The Court elects, upon a full review of those newly raised arguments, to reconsider its prior Order, even though the record is clear that the Special Counsel could have, and should have, raised its current arguments previously.”

Former Mar-a-Lago employees are also anticipated to testify regarding the storage of secret papers discovered at the Florida resort during an FBI raid in August 2022, in addition to government employees. Trump’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the case entirely due to prosecutorial misconduct after Smith’s prior attempts to limit the president’s access to the materials that will be presented were rejected by Cannon. Smith received an ultimatum last month from the federal court, a Trump appointee: produce all records, even ones that contained secrets related to national security, or face a mistrial.

Smith’s overall lack of success has been exacerbated by delays in the trial’s initiation, which makes Wednesday’s announcement all the more noteworthy. Legal experts have cautioned that if the former president is elected again, he may overturn the conviction, which might not occur until after Election Day.

While former Mar-a-Lago employee Brian Butler—referred to as “Trump Employee 5″—has testified before investigators that he unintentionally assisted in the movement and storage of the sensitive materials, President Trump and his co-defendants have entered not guilty pleas.

COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

 

 

 

 

 

Send this to a friend